DRAWING LIFE by fred hatt

2009/12/30

Release

Images from "Glossolalia + Katharsis", 1989, multimedia show produced by Fred Hatt

The tradition of the wild party for New Years probably has something to do with the idea of catharsis, an explosive releasing of pent-up emotion through acting out.  We want to exhaust the frustration, regrets and resentments of the ending year by burning off the lingering energy to awaken to a fresh new day.  Of course in real life it doesn’t work, and waking up to a hangover in no way feels like a clean beginning.  But perhaps an artistic experience can give a taste of liberating paroxysm.  In this spirit I present this little two minute primal scream made twenty years ago.

Excerpts from Glossolalia + Katharsis from Fred Hatt on Vimeo.

There’s a good story behind the making of this film.  One of my housemates at the time, Mike Montgomery (now known as the lounge singer Monty Banks) was planning a tour of the Fringe Theater Festivals in Canada with Buck Duke’s Wild Sex Show, a potpourri of dirty jokes, puppets, magic tricks and R&B music with audience participation.  To attract media attention, Mike planned to stage public confrontations between his character, Buck Duke, a profane cowboy mountebank, and a pompous European artiste named Lorean Dauphine, who would be portrayed in the faux showdowns by different actors hired in each Fringe Festival city.

Mike felt Lorean Dauphine needed his own show, and approached me about producing a multimedia extravaganza that could be presented in the festivals as Dauphine’s work.  I would have just two weeks to complete an hour-long show that could be shown without my having to tour with it.  I suppose I should have been offended that Mike thought of presenting my work as the oeuvre of a pretentious twit, but I thought it was an interesting production challenge and decided to take it as an opportunity to make something experimental.  Mike suggested basing the work on themes from Georges Bataille’s Erotism:  Death and Sensuality.

I put together a slide show with 280 images photographed from my own collection of art books:  depictions of heroism, death and horror, eroticism and enlightenment from many cultures.  The slides were ordered according to a classical hindu theory of Rasas, the gamut of moods or flavors in the arts.

To record a sound track we threw a party where we taped musicians improvising, under the direction of my brother Frank.  I still have his notes for the different phases of the improvisation, which read, “Mirthful glee – righteous rage – sexual ecstasy – wailing & bemoaning – military pride – all falsetto – sustained chanting – percussive noises – tribal trance – everybody improvise poetry at the same time.”  Frank and I had been doing what we called Glossolalia – freely improvised group sounding, mostly vocal – for several years by that time, and for the recording Frank led a large and, I’m afraid, unruly group in this.

We threw another party that filmmaker Eve Heller filmed in 16mm, at which “without rehearsal or preconceived structure, vocal and physical taboos were lifted and the resulting chaos became the ground on which the collective unconscious of the performers could realize itself,” as explained in a statement I wrote for a showing of the piece.  One hour of film was shot, to be presented unedited.  Around this time, I had first experienced the shamanic work of California performance artist Frank Moore, and his influence may be seen in the performance party.

That’s me in the film, juggling sheets of silver mylar and carrying a woman in a slip on my back.  Frank is the guy with a mustache making magic hands at the beginning, and Mike is seen in a wheelchair.  Party like it’s 1989!

The film, slide show, and sound track were created separately, to be exhibited simultaneously, with correspondences occurring only by chance.  The show was presented in New York and at the various Canadian Fringe Festivals.  One reviewer wrote, “Definitely in the running as the worst Fringe show of the year, this combines slides and experimental film in a way that goes beyond baffling. . . redefines self indulgence.”  I figure it’s always good when you can redefine something, and if the critic thought it was so awful I suppose it met Mike’s requirement to represent the work of fictional Lorean Dauphine.  April Panzer, director of TuCCA, the Tulsa Center for Contemporary Art, where the show was also presented, described it as “A cloud of chaos out of which periodically drop gems of insight.”

I felt there was a lot of good stuff in the piece, especially the slide show, but it was a bit long at an hour, so the following year I made this much shorter distillation of a few moments from it, and present it to you now as your cathartic New Years’ party.  All the best to you in 2010.

On my Vimeo page you can see the full credits for the film and music.

2009/12/23

Snow in the City

Snowy Skyy, 2001, photo by Fred Hatt

Last weekend the Eastern U.S. had its first major snowfall of the season, immediately preceding the Winter Solstice.  Around this time of year our culture ritually celebrates the White Christmas and the Winter Wonderland, Jack Frost and Frosty the Snowman, calling up nostalgic images of horse-drawn sleigh rides and cozy houses among rolling hills of pure white.  The reality of snow in the city is more conflicted, both soft and harsh, beauty that rapidly becomes ugliness.  In honor of the season, here are some photos from my collection, images of great New York City snowfalls of the past decade.

Streetlamps illuminate the beautiful movement of swirling snow.  Because of its lightness, snow shows the complexity of whorls and eddies in the flowing air:

Streetlamp Flurry, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Snow at Ground Zero, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

The first dusting adds a cool glamor to the gritty street:

Powdered Bus Lane, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Snow Traffic, 2001, photo by Fred Hatt

Nothing imparts mystery to our mundane environment of walls and ads like a white veil:

Snow-Masked, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

I Love You, 2006, photo by Fred Hatt

Even when the snow is really coming down, the city is always full of rush and bustle:

Spring Snow, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Colors on White, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

If it gets heavy enough, the car traffic stops and major streets become walkways, as in these pictures taken while walking down the middle of Broadway during the blizzard of 2003:

Posing in Blizzard, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Snowy Broadway, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

In the photo immediately above you can see the fog-like effect, with objects in the distance fading to white.  As night falls, beams of light cut and color the swirls and piles:

Snow in Headlights, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

Blizzard Outside Deli, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

Snowy Sidewalk, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

Snow Shadows, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Snowscape, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

Snow’s crumbly clumps cling to windows:

Snowy Windshield, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

Snow on Skylight, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Like grains of sand in an oyster, parked cars are coated with smoothness until they become great white round mounds:

Buried Cars, 2006, photo by Fred Hatt

Snowdrift Car, 2006, photo by Fred Hatt

Other objects are transformed, like this concrete cherub (a popular decoration in my Italian neighborhood):

Snowcapped Cherub, 2005, photo by Fred Hatt

In the heaviest blizzards, like the one we had in 2003, snowfall penetrates even the subway system, drifting down the stairs and through the vents in the sidewalk:

Subway Stairs, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Subway Drift, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

The snow seems to capture particles of diesel exhaust and other things floating in the air, and as it melts off peoples’ shoes the subway tiles get coated with an oily grunge:

Snow Pile in Subway, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Snowplows clearing the streets pile the snow up into huge mountains, packing in parked cars and creating pedestrian barriers that have to be scaled:

Wall of Snow, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Storm drains are clogged and gutters and crosswalks become lakes of dirty slush:

Slush Pallet, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

Within a day, New York City snow is gray and filthy.  Hardened chunks remain even as shoveling, plowing and relentless traffic clear the routes:

Dirty Snow, 2007, photo by Fred Hatt

The high piled-up mounds can last for weeks, even through warm weather, becoming nastier day by day.  I’m sure this is what our lungs look like from breathing urban air:

Filthy Snow, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

As the ice retreats, the salt and other residues leave sedimentary markings on the sidewalk:

Snow Residue, 2008, photo by Fred Hatt

And when the sun comes out, melting snow rains down from the buildings and construction sheds, glittering like gems in the sunlight:

Snowmelt, 2003, photo by Fred Hatt

2009/12/15

Self Portrait

Filed under: Figure Drawing: Portraits — Tags: , , , — fred @ 00:47
Self, 2009 (mirror inverted), by Fred Hatt

Self, 2009 (mirror inverted), by Fred Hatt

This is a self-portrait, drawn in 40 minutes this past Sunday evening.  The version above has been flipped across the vertical axis so it appears as I appear to others, rather than as I see myself in a mirror.  My self-portraits always look a bit angry.  I think it’s just the intensity of the artist’s stare.  I must look like quite an ogre to the models who pose for me!

While making this drawing I put a camera looking over my shoulder, set to take a picture every 30 seconds.  Here are some selected stages in the development of the drawing.

In the first two minutes, I roughed in the highlights, drawing with the edge of my crayon:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 1:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 1:30

Next I started outlining the bright shapes:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 4:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 4:30

And then the dark areas:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 7:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 7:30

I started bringing in the color of the warm-toned light to my left:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 10:00

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 10:00

And the cooler-toned edge lighting to my right:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 11:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 11:30

Then reddish shadows:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 14:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 14:30

I started looking for the highlights within the highlights, making strokes that followed the three-dimensional contours of the face:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 18:00

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 18:00

By that point I was about halfway through the process.  From this point on I was looking at color, details, and correcting distortions.  The face was too thin, so I thickened it up:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 23:00

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 23:00

Toward the end of the process, I was developing the texture of hair and other details.  These features can be drawn with a loose hand, as the energetic feel is more important than the precise detail.  Some shadows appear reddish, while others are cooler in tone.  I used a bluish green, the complement to the natural flesh tone, to deepen these shadows:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 37:30

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt, in progress at 37:30

I stopped at 40 minutes because I wanted the drawing to remain loose and spontaneous.  Here’s the finished version, as drawn, not flipped as in the version at the top of the post:

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Self, 2009, by Fred Hatt

2009/12/07

Light and Stone

Thomas W. Brown, installation at Art Students' League, 2008, photo by Fred Hatt

Thomas W. Brown, installation at Art Students' League, 2008, photo by Fred Hatt

Thomas William Brown is an art therapist and a stone carver.  Many of his works, like those seen above in a detail from an installation of sculptures shown in an exhibit last year at the gallery of the Art Students’ Leage of New York, are based on architectural motifs.  When he talks about his process, Tom speaks of finding forms through carving that already reside within the stone.  Tom gave me one of his pieces, an abstract shape evocative of a female torso in brown alabaster.  Recently I used this sculpture as a photographic model, to experiment with lighting.

One way of seeing a three dimensional form is to look at it from different angles.  In fact this is the way sculptors work, and observational figurative sculptors even have rotating platforms for their models and for their work in progress.  Artists working in two dimensions, with drawing or painting, rely on light and shadow to perceive and depict the three dimensional form of a figure or object.

I studied filmmaking in college, and we spent considerable time learning about the qualities of light and how to use lighting to reveal form and create moods.  Artists that draw and paint study light by observation, but rarely is it part of their learning practice to place, manipulate, and modify sources of light.  For anyone interested in learning about light from this hands-on perspective, Ross Lowell’s book, Matters of Light and Depth, is an excellent, simple yet thorough, introduction.

To see how changing the lighting changes the appearance of Tom’s sculpture, all these photos are taken from the same angle.  Here is the piece with a strong light from up high and to the right:

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #1

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #1

This lighting certainly highlights the sculpture’s resemblance to a female torso with a contrapposto tilt.  The highlights and shadows seem to convey the familiar forms of breasts and a belly.  The light here is from a bare bulb, giving crisp, sharply defined shadows.  In the next version, the light is in the same place, but it is diffused through a large white umbrella:

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #2

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #2

The light striking the sculpture is coming not from a small point but from a broad area.  It’s a bit like the difference between the light on a sunny day and the light on an overcast day.  Highlights and shadows are softened, with smooth gradual transitions between light and dark areas.  The softer light seems to bring out the beautiful subtleties in the color of the stone.  Next, a hard light from the right:

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #3

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #3

Every change in the angle of the light reveals different aspects of the shape of the sculpture, just as looking at if from different points of view would do.  Here, the protrusions that we saw as belly and hip bone could be seen as the back of a head with longish hair and a shoulder of another figure with its back turned to us.

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #6

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #6

The shot above has the light high and to the left side of the sculpture.  In this lighting, what I originally saw as a breast now appears as a rather feline face, while the upper bulge of the belly becomes the feline figure’s shoulder.  The curve on the left, that we initially saw as the transition from ribs to hip, becomes the neck and chest of this newly discovered creature.

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #7

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #7

In the version above, the light source is reflected from a white surface on the floor beneath the platform where the sculpture rests.  The diffuse nature of the light, and its unconventional low angle nearly eliminate the kind of form-revealing shadow cues seen in the first photos of the piece.  Here I am struck by the color variations we can see in the stone.  There are veins of deep red, warm pink and cool gray.  With the form flattened, the color can almost be seen as a painting.

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #9

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009 #9

In the final example I’ve chosen to show here, there are two light sources, one on either side of the sculpture and slightly behind it.  This lighting allows the front of the piece, which might naturally dominate our attention, to be shadowy, while the edges are shown with great clarity.

To conclude this post, here’s a Photoshop experiment.  The versions above labeled as #1, #3, and #6 were converted to grayscale, and then each one was used as one of the color channels for a RGB image using Photoshop’s “merge channels” function.  Don’t worry if you don’t understand that.  The effect is essentially the same as if the sculpture were lit by three different colored lights,  a green one from the right, a blue one from the left, and a red one from up high and slightly to the right.

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009, merge channels version

Thomas W. Brown, Alabaster, 2004, photo by Fred Hatt, 2009, merge channels version

I thank Tom for letting me experiment with his work this way.  It’s good work that seems initially simple, but reveals hidden aspects when explored in more depth!

2009/12/01

The Mind is an Antenna

Filed under: Art and Philosophy — Tags: , , , , — fred @ 00:24
Crystalize, 2000, by Fred Hatt

Crystalize, 2000, by Fred Hatt

A long time ago, someone taught me a simple way of meditation.  I was told that thoughts would come, and I should let them go.  You can’t stop the thoughts coming, but you can choose not to pick up on them or follow them, to just let them come and let them go.  I was taught to focus on the breath coming in and out, to give the mind a simple physical point of attention so that thoughts would not become a central thread.

Thoughts did come, of course.  The experience was like sitting on a city park bench, listening to fragmentary snatches of conversation from the people passing by.  Most of the thoughts were incomplete or nonsensical.  Many were intriguing.  If I had chosen to follow them, I could have spun threads of thinking, feeling, or narrative out of them.  But I chose to let them go, so they remained disjointed fragments.

I’ve had this experience many times since then.  Over time, I have come to believe that the mind does not originate these thoughts, but that thoughts exist in some impersonal mind-field and the mind just perceives them.  The mind is sensing thoughts, not generating them.  Of course, the mind is not just a sensor, but also a processor, so if you latch onto a thought you can build it into a structure using all the cognitive tricks:  emotion, metaphor, narrative, logic.  But the seed-thoughts, I believe, come into the mind from outside.

Projection, 1998, by Fred Hatt

Projection, 1998, by Fred Hatt

Our sense of a coherent self arises from the flow of our sensations, thoughts, and memories.  We identify with what we have experienced and what we think.  But all of that is really external.  Although it is our only way of perceiving ourselves, it is not ourselves.  It is simply the medium through which we move, as water is the medium in which a fish swims.

The world contains every possible kind of sensory input, every kind of experience, all the time.  It is a liberation to realize that we have some control over what aspects of this omnisensorium we choose to give our attention to.  When we pay attention to horror, the threading aspect of the mind will lead us to perceive more and more horror.  Likewise if we choose to focus on beauty or joy or humor.  In terms of thoughts, all kinds of thoughts are in the field at all times.

Like radio waves, many streams of thought are passing through us simultaneously, most of them unperceived.  If we don’t know how to tune our antenna, we are most likely to pick up the loudest signals, the million megawatt superstations.  Unfortunately those signals are mostly vacuous drivel and unfocused emotional urges.  Finding the golden strands in the stream of muck depends on learning to withdraw attention from the loudest and most sensational things so we can give our attention to quieter, subtler things.

Ourania, 1997, by Fred Hatt

Ourania, 1997, by Fred Hatt

The drawings in this post are aquarelle crayon on paper, 18″ x 24″ (46 x 61 cm).

Powered by WordPress

Theme Tweaker by Unreal