DRAWING LIFE by fred hatt

2010/05/12

My Interview with Yasuko

Yasuko Kasaki interviews Fred Hatt at CRS, May 1, 2010, photo by Satomi Kitahara

At the May 1 opening of my solo exhibition “Healing Hands” at CRS in New York, I was interviewed by Yasuko Kasaki, author, teacher, healer and founder of CRS, in their beautiful, newly renovated studio.

The exhibit consisted of three bodies of work:  “Healing Hands”, a series of color drawings based on the hands of the people who do healing work at CRS, “Heads”, larger than life-size portrait drawings, and “Chaos Compositions”, large scale, mostly multi-figure color drawings on black paper.  The “Healing Hands” series remains on view at CRS through May 26, while the other two bodies of work were hung in the CRS studio for the opening on May 1 only. CRS Art Gallery Director Satomi Kitahara organized the event.  See additional photos of the opening here.

The interview was part of the opening program, to introduce those interested in my artwork to my ideas and process.  Just below the next photo is a full transcript of the interview.  I have omitted the audience Q and A section to keep this to a reasonable length, but questioners brought up some interesting ideas that will be addressed in this blog soon.

Yasuko Kasaki interviews Fred Hatt at CRS, May 1, 2010, photo by Satomi Kitahara

Yasuko Kasaki:  We’ve set up this series named Artist’s Way.  Do you know the book, The Artist’s Way?  Yeah, great book about process and how to progress our creative energy and so on.  I’d like to let Fred talk about his secrets and his way of seeing things.  First we should start with the Healing Hands, our exhibition.  Those are the hands of healers, including mine.  We do spiritual healing, and we see so-called energy.  Energy is not actually the appropriate word, as a matter of fact.  We are not seeing energy, but we see the quality of the spirit and mind and networking and flow, and connection and balance of the mind power or life force, or something like that.  While we are doing this kind of healing, Fred, you see us and see something through your eyes.  How do you see the energy?

Fred Hatt:  Those drawings were mostly done before and after the healing circles that you have here.  The various healers that were models for the drawings  would sit in meditation, so they were just sitting and focusing their own energy within and I was just sketching.

Healing Hands #8, 2010, by Fred Hatt

I have always tried to see the human subject as energy rather than as an object.  I don’t claim to have any clairvoyant ability or anything like that, but I have practiced life drawing with devotion and discipline over a long time.  I go to two or three life drawing classes with timed poses every week.  I’ve been doing that for about fifteen years.  I’ve gotten to a level where the response of my hand is very quick.  I think that what the lines of the drawing record are the movements of perception.    I’m constantly looking, and as the eyes move and see a surface or notice some little thing, there’s a gesture of the hand that goes exactly with that.  The closer the link is between the perceiving and the gesture, the more it picks up the energy or the movement of the act of perception.  The act of perception is an interactive energetic or spiritual link with the person that I’m looking at.  I think that intuitively it really captures something.

I did sketches of the healers’ hands, then later I took them away and did some further work, colors and backgrounds, in my own studio.  More imagination comes into that part of it, but that’s also an intuitive response to what I can see from the position of the hands.  Every little thing expresses something about the person:  the way they choose to show their hands, the way that they’re resting, every little movement – little fidgets and adjustments.  All of those things are ways of perceiving some quality of the energy.  You start to see things not so much as an object of solid matter, but as something that’s flowing.

YK:  I thought figurative painters study anatomy of the muscles and bones, but you don’t see those things?

FH:  Well, I do, and I have studied that kind of thing also of course.  I’m fascinated with that.  But I also thought that’s not the only kind of anatomy there is.  I’m self-taught as an artist, so I just looked into anything I thought was interesting and relevant.   I learned about different ideas of the energy body, chakras and meridians and auras and all that kind of thing, because those systems are created by people who have focused on understanding the energy flow and the ways that different parts of the body are dynamically related, so there are insights to be had from any of that.  But I don’t rigidly follow any of those things.  I just take in as much information as possible and then try to respond intuitively in the moment, rather than systematically.

Healing Hands #9, 2010, by Fred Hatt

YK:  You say moment, but those hands are still, and those faces are still – but not still at all.  They are moving, because you are drawing movement.  So then, you are drawing and constantly changing, right?  So change and movement – you just try to get everything on the paper.

FH:  Well, the model is basically still, although a living person is never really still.  Even if a model in an art class is trying to sit perfectly still, they’re breathing, the blood is flowing, the mind is working, the nerves are working.   There’s a lot of flowing energy going on.  There’s also a lot of energy being exchanged between the model and the artist, because for the person posing, when you are being witnessed, when you feel that you are being seen, that really changes your experience.  It makes everything you do, it makes your being a communication, a sharing.  I think of drawing also as a sharing.  I feel like if someone is posing for me, that’s a generous act, letting me really look, letting me try to see as much as I can see of someone.   I feel like I have to work as hard as I can, I have to put as much as I can put into it, to honor that.  I want that to be a gift back.  I think that a lot of artists are making work for the public or the critics or whoever.  I always feel like I’m doing it for the models first.  I want them to see how I see them.  I want it to be a mutual sharing act.

Donna, 2009, by Fred Hatt

YK:  When I saw you for the first time here [at CRS], you were dancing here.  [To audience] You know that he is a great dancer, great performer, he is so talented.  And among other performers, he is really, I don’t want to use the word outstanding – outstanding too, but I don’t want to compare – but the quality of his performance is a little bit different.  Other performers just showed us what they created, and said “See us.”  But Fred’s way is “See?  Can you see?  Let’s see together.  You can see this movement, you can see this light, see?  It’s beautiful.  See?  You enjoy this?”  Anything he does, his attitude is like that.  [back to Fred] So sharing is all the time your  core.  And the gift is not from me to you, it’s just together.  Let’s get this gift.  This is your attitude.  Great, I think.

FH:  Picasso said “Creativity is happiness.”  I really believe that.

Shadows from Fred Hatt on Vimeo.

(The video embedded above is a performance by Fred Hatt and Corinna Brown, done at CRS in 2007.  More info available here.)

YK:  Can you talk about color?  I see color in the energy field.  But how do you see these colors?  I don’t think you perceive the same color, probably differently.

FH:  I don’t take the same approach to color all the time.  In  some of the heads, the portrait drawings here, if you look at them from a distance the color looks fairly realistic, it looks like skin tone, but if you look close, there are no skin tone colors there.  It’s a lot of different colors kind of mixing in the eye.  I’m actually trying to capture some sense of the color I see, with the idea that color is a relative rather than an absolute quality.  Colors change according to what they’re next to, and the colors of something like human skin are so subtle that if you try to just copy the surface color it’s flat and dead looking, so I’m trying to find those subtle variations.  Where the blood is closer to the surface you get pinker tones, for example.  That sort of thing gives this feeling of what’s below the surface, the life.

Michael W, 2009, by Fred Hatt

On these larger drawings with the multiple overlapping figures, I use color in a much more abstract way.  I should describe the process.  I work in my studio with a model.  We start out doing quick poses, and I just do simple line drawings.  I just grab colors at random.  I have a big bowl of crayons, and I just use whatever I pull out.  That way, once I have a huge mess of overlapping drawings, I can sort of follow one out of the mess by following the same color.  It becomes a massive chaotic mess of lines that looks like nothing but static, and then I try to go into it and find order in the chaos.  I develop parts of some of the figures, pull things forward, push things back, and find some kind of structure into it.  It’s an improvisational process.  This way of working creates these complex compositions which I would never be able to design.  If I made preparatory sketches and tried to figure it all out on paper, I couldn’t do it.  It only emerges from the process.

Seer, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Another thing that’s interesting to me about these is that for the viewer, it requires a much more active kind of looking than a picture.  If you look at the portrait drawings, that’s a picture.  You see and grasp the whole image.  It’s very direct.  Most figurative artwork is like that.  When you look at these more complex pieces, you look into them and try to find what’s there and find the interesting juxtapositions that happen by chance.

The color in these pieces is, in the beginning of the work, random, as are several other aspects of the process.  In the later development stages, I choose colors just out of an aesthetic sense.  The colors in these aren’t symbolic or anything like that, but they emerge in the process.  I think just because they’re on black, the colors have this neon, or black velvet painting, quality of light.  I like to draw on a darker surface, because I think I see the light first, then the shadows.  If you draw on white paper you really have to start with the shadows.

YK:  What’s the difference between your seeing movement and drawing it, and your doing movement yourself, very different ways of expression as an artist?

FH:  My experience with movement and performance happened from just following my interests, because since I was self-taught I didn’t have any teacher telling me I need to go in a particular direction.  I think most figurative artists are not interested in experimental performance art.  At least, when I meet other figurative artists, and I tell them I’m interested in that sort of stuff, they’re like “Ugh.”  But for me that experimental work was really interesting because the artists were treating the creative process as an experience, rather than as the production of an object.  I think that’s a very interesting approach.  Before the invention of photography, just the ability to create a realistic image was a form of magic.  Images were rare and had power just in their illusion of reality.  Nowadays, we live in a world where we’re bombarded with images constantly.  There are screens and advertising everywhere you look.  Images don’t, in themselves, have any magic at all any more.  They’re just pollution.  How do you get back to that feeling of it having magic and power?  To me, these really experimental artists, the butoh artists, the people that were doing happenings and that kind of thing, were trying to approach that problem by giving people an experience that can transform your perception.

I needed to incorporate this approach into my own exploration.  I studied butoh dance and I did a lot of work with performance.   I had to eventually come back more to visual art and drawing because I felt like that’s where my talent was strongest, and it’s where I found that I had the ability to do a really disciplined practice.  And I’m an introverted kind of person, so visual art is more natural for that.  But I think that the experience of performing was about trying to find new states.  To enter into a performing state is sort of shamanic.  What I learned from that really does inform the way that I draw, because if I’m trying to capture someone’s movement or their inner states, my own experience of feeling movement informs it, at least intuitively.

Range, 2009, by Fred Hatt

YK:  You were doing really interesting and crazy things in New York City with the performers, gathering in the early morning and doing really crazy things and naked things.

FH:  I haven’t really done that kind of thing recently, but back in the 90’s, in the days before 9/11, when there was no security anywhere, you could get away with anything in New York City, and we did.  I think the specific thing you’re talking about is a series of performances in the summer of ’97.  It was a collaboration that I worked out with Julie Atlas Muz, who is a well known burlesque performer and also a really good postmodern choreographer who did a lot of really creative and unusual performances.  In that summer, every day that was a new moon or a full moon day, we would go out before dawn, with whatever other performers we could get to come with us, to some location around the city, the Staten Island Ferry, or Central Park, or Coney Island, some interesting location where there were a lot of things to interact with, and we did these interactive, improvisational happenings.  Usually the only audience was people that we invited to come along and take pictures or video, but sometimes there were other people around, especially on the Staten Island Ferry where we sort of had a captive audience.  The people that were performing could pretty much do whatever they wanted, but at that time of day, five o’clock in the morning, there is this incredible, powerful thing happening, the transformation of night into day.  It’s a lighting effect that you couldn’t get from a theater lighting designer.  If you had millions of dollars you couldn’t make something that amazing, and each time it was different.  The birds are the rulers of that time, and they’re so loud, and human beings are so quiet.  It’s the time when everyone is asleep, everyone is dreaming, and so even though you’re awake, you can be in a dream in the real world, because it’s the time when everyone is dreaming,  That’s the predominant energy.  Really amazing things happened in those performances.  It was a struggle to get up really early in the morning and trek out to some place to do this thing, but then when we got done, we had to kill several hours before going to work or whatever.

Video capture from "Early Morning Dances: Belvedere Castle", 1997, performance by Julie Atlas Muz and Fred Hatt

YK:  Yeah, now there’s security, everything has changed, but you are still open to happening.  And happening is the same as miracles.  You cannot make up a happening, but you can keep your mind open to happening.  But to do so, I believe you need discipline.  So your mind is really based on the steady, long discipline, I believe.  So what kind of discipline are you keeping?

FH:  The regular life drawing classes I mentioned, I’m really devoted to that, and that’s a kind of a meditative practice, but it’s an active thing.  I also have had a practice, not quite as disciplined I have to say, with movement.  All of the practice is to get to that place where you are confident enough that you can just respond immediately without having to think about anything, without uncertainty.

YK:  How many years have you been doing so?

FH:  You know, that’s really hard to answer, because since I’m self-taught as an artist, people  say, “How long have you been doing that, when did you start?”  Well, I was drawing when I was a kid.  It took me many years to kind of find my way in bits and pieces, and that’s just an impossible question to answer because there are so many different moments where you could say it started here, or it started there.  The regular life drawing practice has been the most consistent thing, and that started in the mid-90’s, but before that I was also doing a lot of creative things, but I was just a little bit unfocused,  I would be writing poetry for a while, and then I’d lose my inspiration, and I’d start to do painting, and then I’d do that until I just felt like I was doing the same thing all the time, and then I’d stop and I’d start making films or something.  It took me a while to realize that I wasn’t going to get anywhere that way.  I think my youthful idea was that art was about being in an inspired state, and over time I realized it’s really more about steady work and discipline.  The inspired state is not so much about something that strikes you from the clouds, but more like really long work on changing the way that you experience the world, so that it’s experienced as magical.

Auricle, 2008, by Fred Hatt

YK:  Do you know even Picasso tried to write a poem?  He was struggling from painting and one day thought, writing looks much easier, and he wrote some poems and recited in front of friends, and Gertrude Stein said “Stop it!  Go back to painting.  At least your painting is better than your poems!”

FH:  One thing I think I learned from deciding to be dedicated to practice is that when you feel frustrated, that’s not a bad thing, because usually when you feel frustrated, it’s not going very well, what that really means is somewhere on the inside you’ve already moved up to another level.  You just aren’t able to do it yet.  So if you just keep going, you will reach that level.

YK:  So to say something as the artist is to go beyond perception.  So beyond perception is to try to reach vision, and reaching vision is always a happy experience, but somehow we are scared at happiness itself.  So that’s why you are training yourself to be happy, happy, to get used to the happy experience.  That’s why we can’t stop joining you.  Your art is like that for me.

But I can answer what you couldn’t answer by yourself, when you started drawing.  It’s 1961. [Holds up copy of drawing]  This is José Greco.  Fred Hatt, three year old boy, just saw flamenco, and somehow, he drew it.  This is his first – it’s amazing.

José Greco Dancing in Purple Boots, 1961, by Fred Hatt

FH:  The story of that:  I was a well-behaved little child, and I was the first child, and my parents were young, they were really interested in cultural events, and they could get away with bringing me, because I didn’t make noise, so they took me to all these things.  They took me to see this famous flamenco dancer of the time, José Greco.  I was so turned on by that, because it had stomping, and it was passionate, and I had never encountered anything like that before, so I drew that.  I rediscovered that drawing when I was around 40 years old.  I had finally come to the point I was really developing my visual art, and I was running these movement drawing classes where we had the models moving instead of standing still, and artists that were willing to try that would try to capture the feeling of movement, and I was working with a lot of dancers and performers.  I went back and visited my parents and I decided to look for the old artwork that they saved, and that’s the earliest thing.  I thought, wow, look at this:  I was three and I already was inspired by movement and dance, and the way I was trying to capture it was scribbling with crayons!  And it took me almost forty years to find my way back!

(An earlier blog post also tells the story of the José Greco drawing).

Here’s a panoramic view showing the large works in the CRS Studio.  You may need to scroll to the right to see it all.

Panorama of exhibit in CRS Studio, 2010, photo by Fred Hatt

The Healing Hands drawings are 18 3/8″ x 24 1/2″.  The Heads (portraits) are 50 cm x 70 cm.  The larger works seen above range from 36″ x 48″ to 60″ x 60″.  All works are aquarelle on paper.

2010/03/29

Reverse Engineering a Drawing

Twists, 2010 by Fred Hatt

Reverse engineering is taking something apart to find out how it was put together.  The term usually applies to technology or manufactured products, particularly in the case of competitors seeking to discover trade secrets or make knockoffs.  I’ve never heard the phrase applied to an artwork, but a drawing or painting does conceal stages of construction.  In my last post I wrote about artist William Kentridge.  His method of charcoal drawing animation reveals the drawings he exhibits as processes of exploration and development.

Over the last seven years I’ve been making large-scale drawings with multiple overlapping figures.  Each of these is created in close collaboration with a single model.  I call them “chaos compositions” because their process involves drawing over and over on the same page to create a field of chaos, and then working to find a dynamic structure within that chaos.  Many examples, and an explanation of the process, can be found in this gallery on my portfolio site, and others in the blog posts “Time and Line”.  The stages of development of a chaos composition are shown in the post “Composing on the Fly”.

“Twists”, pictured at the top of the post, is a recent chaos composition, 48″ x 60″, or 122 cm x 152 cm, aquarelle crayon on paper, created in collaboration with the great model Madelyn.  Figurative elements are clearly visible, but the overlapping is dense enough that much of it is essentially abstract.  Different colors are used in different figures, making it possible to discern connected parts of individual figures by following lines of certain colors.  I’m trying to create images that require a more active approach to viewing than the traditional straightforward pictorial composition, and finding the starting figures is one way of active looking at these pictures.  It’s a little easier to do this with the original drawings, in which the figures are close to life size, than with a small online reproduction, but here I’m going to do it for you, using cropping and selective digital erasure to separate the component figures.

Figure 1, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

The lower part of this figure is easy to see in the finished piece, but the upper part has been heavily overdrawn and is difficult to find.  On these re-separated figures, where you see many other colors crossing over some of the contour lines, as in the left arm above, that is an indication of great density in the final piece.  Below, two figures from the left side of the picture.

Figure 2, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Figure 3, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

One of these figures serves to frame the lower left corner of the picture, while the other turns away, to reach out of the frame.  The line of the back has been sketched twice in the one just above, once in pink and then in a light blue, with a slightly altered repeat of the pose.  Toward the middle of the piece, there are several more dramatic poses.

Figure 4, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Figure 5, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

The figure below is particularly hidden.  The hand, in white, really stands out, but the forward-bending figure with the crossed feet is difficult to distinguish in the dense mass of line and color.

Figure 6, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

The one below is a little easier to see, but it’s an unusual pose that may be hard to figure out, and the drawing is somewhat distorted.  The model was twisting and leaning to her left side, so the angle of view appears to be from below.

Figure 7, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

The figure below is in the upper right corner and has much less overlapping than the central figures.  This pose is a complex sculptural arrangement of counterbalanced curves.

Figure 8, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

In the middle of the composition is this standing figure, which is ghostly and hard to see.  Nearly every part of this figure is masked by something more dominant in its vicinity, including the yellow raised hand, which becomes an echo of the bolder white hand above it.

Figure 9, from Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Now that you’ve seen the drawing deconstructed, look again at the final version.  There are things going on here that can’t be seen in the separated figures, juxtapositions like the multiple hands in the upper middle area, organic shapes that appear between or in the overlaps of other shapes.  It is a picture of energy, a sketch of a single figure moving in time and space, an attempt to see in four dimensions.  I hope that the total is more than the sum of its parts.

Twists, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Thanks again to Madelyn, the model for this piece, a fine model and a great creative collaborator.

2010/02/07

Rhythmic Line

Modern Dance, 2008, by Fred Hatt

A sense of rhythm is as central to the art of drawing as it is to music.  It is the movement of the artist’s hand that gives a drawing its sense of movement and life.  Strokes that are fluid and responsive imbue a sketch with vitality.

I run a session at Spring Studio in Manhattan, where beginners struggling to get the hang of drawing from life work alongside accomplished artists who have logged many thousands of hours at the drawing board.  If you look at people at work, you’ll notice that most beginners draw tentatively.  They measure a lot and try to use intellectual knowledge to figure out what they’re seeing before they make their marks.  There is no rhythm or flow to their lines.  The parts of the body are drawn separately and never quite seem to integrate into a lifelike figure.  But watch a really good artist and you’ll see that the hand is in motion most of the time, moving with the sureness and lightness of a conductor’s baton.

Lounging Ryan, 2008, by Fred Hatt

The contours of the body are all curves of various kinds.  In drawing, these curves are translated into movements of the hand.  I allow my perception to flow along the contours like a skier gliding along the grooves and rises of a snow surface.  The drawing hand moves at a fairly constant pace, and those contours become rhythmic gestures traced onto the paper.

Natural, 2010, by Fred Hatt

In quick drawing, I almost never do any kind of measurement to determine proportions.  If the flow of movement is constant, proportions fall into place because of a sense of rhythm in the changes of direction.  The movement of the hand continues even when the pencil or brush is lifted from the paper, so that every rounded form is carried through from the front to the back, or from one side to the other.  Thus even an unshaded line drawing is given a sense of solidity and connection.

Arch, 2010, by Fred Hatt

In longer, more finished drawings, I do measure proportional and angular relationships and make corrections, but only after I’ve first captured the feeling of the pose through this rhythmic tracing of contours.  Proportions rigidly applied can crush the life out of a sketch, while giving priority to the flow and connection of forms can make a drawing communicate living energy even if the proportions are pretty far off.

Clasped Hands on Hip, 2008, by Fred Hatt

Attitude, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Complex shapes like hands, or complex poses that are hard to analyze in terms of straight lines, become simpler when treated as a continuous flow of curved shapes.

Hands, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Writhe, 2009, by Fred Hatt

The following sketches were done at Cross Pollination at Green Space Studio, a monthly event that offers the opportunity to draw while dancers warm up and move freely in the studio.  The dancers aren’t posing – even when they’re stretching or relaxing, they don’t stay in one position for more than a few seconds at a time.  The strokes I make are rough gestures, more often responding to memories of fleeting perceptions rather than the simultaneous perceiving and drawing I do in a life drawing session with timed poses.

Dancers Stretching, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Three Moving Figures, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Three Resting Figures, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Improvised Movement, 2008, by Fred Hatt

And here are two large-scale drawings – the first is 30″ x 48″ (76 x 122 cm) and the second is 48″ x 60″ (122 x 152 cm) – that take rhythmic flowing contours beyond the simplicity of the quick sketch:

Nyx, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Star, 2008, by Fred Hatt

If you like the movement drawings from Cross Pollination, check out this post for more.

2010/01/22

Give Me a Minute or Two

Hand Over Eyes, 2010, by Fred Hatt

A typical traditional life drawing class starts with quick poses, one or two minutes each, and then proceeds to progressively longer poses.  Some people call quick poses “warm-ups”, reflecting the idea that a drawing session is like a workout.  For the artist, responding as quickly as possible limbers up the hand-eye coordination.  For the model, stretching and twisting wakes up the body and gets the energy flowing, which helps in holding the longer poses to come.  Some people call quick poses “action poses” or “gestures”, because both model and artist strive to project a feeling of movement or expression.

Crouch with Twist, 2009, by Fred Hatt

I love quick poses because they invite a sense of abandon in the models.  Active poses reveal a personal essence in how a model projects energy, and how that energy is revealed through the particular forms of the body.

Begging, 2010, by Fred Hatt

When you only have a minute or two, you have to respond directly.  There’s no time to waste dithering over corrections or using an analytical approach.  Faces, hands and feet are “detail traps” so I usually indicate them with very simplified marks.  The contours that reveal the expressiveness of a pose are all simple curves.  Each curve that I discover can be rendered with a single stroke of pencil, pen or brush.

Preparing to Rise, 2009, by Fred Hatt

These simple curves can indicate considerable detail about the model’s anatomy as well as their pose.  Drawable curves are not only the outlines of parts of the body, but may also be found in creases in the skin, the bulges of muscles or bones, or even the edges between areas of light and shadow.

Front and Back, 2009, by Fred Hatt

I try to keep one curve flowing directly into the next.  And though I usually sketch using only lines, not shading, I am always aware of the shading, and I see every curve as indicating a three dimensional form that has depth and heft.

Stepping Up and Turning Head, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Skin folds and the features of underlying anatomical structures often give a sense of the swooping or thrusting direction of movement of a pose.

Twist on Knees, 2009, by Fred Hatt

I’ll continue by interspersing some quotes from Kimon Nicolaides’ brilliant book, The Natural Way to Draw (1941, Houghton Mifflin).  This is the best approach to learning drawing that I’ve ever come across.  Though I describe myself as self-taught since I never went to art school, in a real sense Nicolaides was my teacher, through this book.  My sketches aren’t specific illustrations of the words that appear adjacent to them, they’re just interleaved to keep both eye and mind engaged.

Step and Reach, 2009, by Fred Hatt

“You should draw, not what the thing looks like, not even what it is, but what it is doing.  Feel how the figure lifts or droops – pushes forward here – pulls back there – pushes out here – drops down easily there.  Suppose that the model takes the pose of a fighter with fists clenched and jaw thrust forward angrily.  Try to draw the actual thrust of the jaw, the clenching of the hand.  A drawing of prize fighters should show the push, from foot to fist, behind their blows that makes them hurt.”

Crawling and Seeking, 2009, by Fred Hatt

“This thing we call gesture is as separate from the substance through which it acts as the wind is from the trees that it bends.  Do not study first the shape of an arm or even the direction of it.  That will come in other exercises.  Become aware of the gesture, which is a thing in itself without substance.”

Upward and Downward, 2009, by Fred Hatt

“Gesture is intangible.  It cannot be understood without feeling, and it need not be exactly the same thing for you as for someone else.  To discover it there is required only practice and awareness on your part.  You learn about it more from drawing than from anything I can say.”

Hands to Floor, 2009, by Fred Hatt

“By gesture we mean, not any one movement, but the completeness of the various movements of the whole figure.  That is why in the beginning I told you to keep the whole thing going at once.  The awareness of unity must be first and must be continuous.”

Head in Hands, 2009, by Fred Hatt

“The eye alone is not capable of seeing the whole gesture.  It can only see parts at a time.  That which puts these parts together in your consciousness is your appreciation of the impulse that created the gesture.  If you make a conscious attempt merely to see the gesture, the impulse which caused it is lost to you.  But if you use your whole consciousness to grasp the feeling – the impulse behind the immediate picture – you have a far better chance of seeing more truly the various parts.  For the truth is that by themselves the parts have no significant identity.  You should attempt to read first the meaning of the pose, and to do this properly you should constantly seek the impulse.”

Triangular Reach, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Nicolaides’ approach to learning drawing starts from two basic concepts, gesture and contour.  Initially they seem like opposite ways of approaching the figure.  Gesture drawing focuses on action and expression, while contour drawing focuses on form.  In practice, at least in my own experience, the two approaches gradually merge through practice.  Ultimately the energy of gesture imbues the tracing of contours, and the distinction between gesture and contour disappears.

Leaning Slope, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Forward, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Foot Thrust Back, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Most figurative artists have a natural inclination to prefer either quick poses or long poses.  Many artists in a self-directed practice choose to work on only one or the other.  I believe the best thing any artist can do to deepen their life drawing skills is to seriously tackle the type of pose they do not naturally relate to.  The energy and efficiency developed through quick drawing practice can significantly enliven a long pose drawing.  The sustained attention and notice of subtleties exercised in longer drawings hone the perception that is key to drawing quick poses.

Shoulder Stand, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Stepping Up, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Here are three more pages from my sketchbook, each one containing two sketches of action poses, subsequent poses by the same model from a quick pose set.  Notice what different qualities of energy and feeling are expressed in the poses that share the page.  This is the real heart of the study of life drawing:  the amazing variety of expression of the human body.

Head Turning, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Stride and Crouch, 2010, by Fred Hatt

Sad and Proud, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Most of the sketches in this post are two-minute poses.  They’re drawn with pencil or cartridge brush-pen in sketchbooks, sizes 11″ x 14″ (28 x 36 cm) or 14″ x 17″ (36 x 43 cm).

2010/01/15

Textural Bodypaint

Filed under: Body Art — Tags: , , , — fred @ 01:08

Vivid Dust, 2000, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Looking through my personal library this week, I came across an old book called “Design by Accident” by James F. O’Brien.  It’s full of ways to incorporate chance and natural phenomena into visual arts and crafts.  Just the Table of Contents makes me feel inspired, so I’ll share it here:

Tree Forms:  trunks and branches formed by the movement of pigments and liquids

Cracks and crackle:  layers in tension

Crawl:  rejection of paint by an incompatible surface

Drip, Dribble, Drop:  Pollock’s discovery and random patterns

Splash and Run:  designs formed by vigorous impact and gravity

Flow and Swirl:  “marble effect”

Wrinkles and Folds:  folding and bending of surfaces

Flowers:  patterns formed by drops of pigment on a coated surface

Max Ernst’s frottage technique and Pollock’s drips, Rorschach’s psychoanalytic ink blots and Hans Jenny’s Cymatics are among the well-known examples of this kind of thing in recent culture, but scenic painters, fabric artists, faux-finish decorators and craftsmen have always used these methods.  It is impossible to control the outcome tightly, but letting go of such control allows the magic of physics to impart its inimitable majesty.

For much of my own work the human body has been my playground, and I’ve used some of these techniques to create textural effects in body painting.  In this post I’ll share several examples.

Splatter, 1997, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Squeezing paint from squeeze botttles and letting colors run into other colors produces beautiful effects.   In the 1990’s I used to do this kind of body painting as a cabaret act in collaboration with performance artist Sue Doe, using fluorescent paints that glowed under blacklight.  One of our performances at the Blue Angel Cabaret was featured in the HBO series Real Sex episode 25.  I’ll do a whole post about the blacklight performances some day, but for now here’s one image of the squirting technique under blacklight:

Green Snake, 1998, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

And here are the beautiful fluorescent colors running thin as they are cleaned off in the shower:

Rinse, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Handprints have been used since the stone age to make dynamic patterns in paint:

Handprints, 1992, bodypaint by Fred Hatt and Jen S., photo by Fred Hatt

When tempera paint dries, it cracks and flakes off.  The crackled texture adds an air of antiquity to this freeform painting:

Fresco, 1996, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

And here, a coat of paint on the body has been rewetted and worn thin, drying with a marbled effect:

Marbled Belly, 1991, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Sculptors’ clay smeared onto the body dries in a patchy way, depending on local thickness, making fleeting textural patterns:

Wet and Dry, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

In this one, clay was applied first for texture, and then paint was applied over the rough, earthy surface:

World Egg, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

In this body painting session, done for a cover illustration for Lauren Stauber‘s haunting CD, Solarheart, the first layer was yellow and red paint, with clay applied over it.  The colors subtly bleed through the dusty clay surface.  Dried flower petals are scattered on top of the body:

Petal Strewn, 1998, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Here, the model is covered with the dry powdered pigments used in the Hindu spring festival called Holi.  In the festival, which is celebrated in many places in India, and here in New York in Richmond Hill, Queens, celebrants plaster each other with hurled vividly colored powders and liquid colors.

Holi, 1999, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Here, powdered pigments and bronze powder are used on the body, blended with massage oil:

Jeweled, 1999, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Here, the front of the body is painted with oil and powdered pigments, and the back with clay and red paint:

Agate, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

In this one, the first layer is blue paint, with clay applied over that and bronze powder blown across to adhere to the wet areas when the clay is in the patchily dried state as seen in the black and white photo above:

Lapis and Gold, 2001, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Here’s a combination of the bronze powder with the powdered Holi pigments:

Painted Desert, 2000, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

An important focus of my exploration of body painting is the experience of the person who is painted.  Being painted is often experienced as a bodily transformation, an external experience of the skin that reflects or enables an internal shift of consciousness.  This ritual aspect underlies the importance of body art in shamanic and theatrical performance.  The stark white body paint associated with butoh dance originated with butoh progenitor Tatsumi Hijikata‘s experimentation with using plaster on his dancers’ bodies.  He wished to intensify their movement by making them conscious of the entire expanse of their skin through tightness and discomfort.  Oil, clay, powders and cracked tempera on the skin are tactile sensations that may be experienced as being one with earth or finding one’s wild animal nature.

Animal, 1997, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

I’ll close with a dyptich of textural legs.  In the upper image the paint is done not by the scattering or dripping methods used in many of the pictures above, but by tracing the blood vessels visible through the skin.  The legs in the lower image are painted with blue powder over oil:

Vessels, 2007, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Gateway, 2006, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Other body painting, most of it more painterly in approach, can be seen on my portfolio site, or on other posts on this blog under the category “Body Art“.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Theme Tweaker by Unreal