Skip to content

The Secret of Practice

Marina, December, 1994, by Fred Hatt

Practice itself is no secret. Everybody knows you have to practice to be good at anything athletic or artistic. Talk to anyone who has brilliant skills, whether with a fiddle or a basketball or a theatrical role, and you can bet you’ll hear they spend a lot of time practicing.

Shifra, December, 1995, by Fred Hatt

I’m a big believer in practice. As a young self-taught artist I had no consistent and regular practice, and it soon became clear that the occasional flashes of brilliance I perceived in my own work weren’t going to turn into any steady flame without a more disciplined approach. In 1994 I began a regular practice of attending timed life drawing sessions. I’ve continued to this day and will do so as long as I live.

Arthur, December, 1996, by Fred Hatt

The point about practice that I intend to make in this post can’t really be illustrated.  I thought maybe looking at my sketchbooks over the years would reveal something about the effects of sustained practice on my work, but it’s not perfectly clear.  The drawings show a great deal of variability due to changes of media, different models, or my own energetic state on a given day.  Of course it’s a bit overwhelming to look at thousands of sketchbook pages over sixteen years.  What I have chosen to intersperse with these paragraphs is simply sketchbook pages (or double pages) of quick poses (one or two minutes), one each from the month of December of each year since my practice began in December 1994.  These are all practice drawings.  None were made with the intention to exhibit them.  There’s no direct relation between the images and the adjacent paragraphs.

Bruno, December, 1997, by Fred Hatt

Now when I look back at my work from 1994 and my work from today, I can see a lot of development. The quick sketches have become bolder and surer.  The long drawings have gotten looser and lighter.  The biggest improvement of all came in the first months of regular practice.  The long-term gains are subtler, but deep.

Rae, December, 1998, by Fred Hatt

The life drawing sessions I attend are filled with people who believe in practice. There are a lot of regulars there who have been pursuing the practice much longer than I have. Why, I wondered, do some of these devoted practicers not seem to show any improvement in their skill? (I won’t name names!)

Estella & Rudy, December, 1999, by Fred Hatt

The artists who show no growth aren’t challenging themselves. They tread the same well-worn path over and over again. They started out challenging themselves, but as soon as they found an approach that pleased them or earned praise from others, they stopped right there and went into endless repeat mode.

Daniel, December, 2000, by Fred Hatt

If you are an artist, you may have had the experience of being encouraged to maintain the rut. When a dealer finds work that sells, they want more of the same, not more experimentation.

Nora, December, 2001, by Fred Hatt

Many of the artists at the studio only want to do what they’re good at. A typical class starts with quick poses and increases the length, finishing with longer poses. Artists that excel with long poses but deal awkwardly with quick poses often come late to avoid the quick poses at the beginning of the class. Artists that do well with quick poses and tend to bog down on the long poses often leave early. They may be avoiding the experience of producing “bad drawings”, but they’re not doing their craft any favors.

Maryam, December, 2002, by Fred Hatt

This week I was reading, in the New York Times Sunday Book Review, a review by Annie Murphy Paul of a book I haven’t read, The Genius in All of Us, by David Shenk. I came across this sentence: “Whatever you wish to do well, Shenk writes, you must do over and over again, in a manner involving, as [Anders] Ericsson put it, ‘repeated attempts to reach beyond one’s current level,’ which results in ‘frequent failures.’ This is known as ‘deliberate practice,’ and over time it can actually produce changes in the brain, making new heights of achievement possible.”

Maggie, December, 2003, by Fred Hatt

I couldn’t have put it better. Bodybuilders use the term “training to failure“, and many of them believe pushing the muscles to the point of failure is essential to increasing strength and bulk. I believe an artist should also train to failure.

Christophe, December, 2004, by Fred Hatt

In art, when you start a practice, you’re failing every time. This is why beginner’s practice shows such amazing gains. When you finally reach a level that pleases you, you can easily stay at that level without continuing to experience failure. Of course, you will not experience any further growth either.

Carlos, December, 2005, by Fred Hatt

Artists at the open studio drawing sessions often say they’re having a “good day”, meaning they’re happy with their work, or a “bad day”, meaning they’re unhappy with what they’re getting. But if you want to expand beyond your limitations, you should view every drawing as a failure. After all, there’s no end point of perfection where a work of art is all it can possibly be. If you are trying to depict what you perceive, keep looking – you’re not quite getting it all yet. If you are trying to be as expressive as possible, keep trying – there is still more that you feel, that is not yet making it into your work.

Alley, December, 2006, by Fred Hatt

Once you get pretty good at something, you should be constantly on guard against settling into the comfortable rut. Keep challenging yourself. Try changing your media or the scale of your drawing or your position in relation to the model. Try using your non-dominant hand. Keep varying little things. Whether you have a minute or several hours to capture a pose, always consider that amount of time not quite enough, so that you must work furiously against the relentless clock. These are the small everyday ways of challenging yourself that can hone your craft.

Stephanie, December, 2007, by Fred Hatt

Bigger challenges can actually deepen your art. That’s harder to talk about because those bigger challenges are much more idiosyncratic and uncommon. Often, the great challenges come from outside, rather than being self-imposed. But by constantly challenging your craft in small ways, you are also developing flexibility and an orientation towards responding to problems by growth and adaptation rather than by denial and resistance.

Jaece, December, 2008, by Fred Hatt

In small things, strive beyond your ability. In large things, aspire to the impossible. Welcome failure, as often as possible. Failure is your friend!  That’s the secret!

Betty, December, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Share
  • http://www.artmodelbook.com/ Andrew

    It’s fun to peek in your sketchbooks.
    I would guess there would be a more obvious progression of skill and style evident in your 20 minute drawings than in your 2 minute drawings.

    • http://www.fredhatt.com/blog/ fred

      Andrew, perhaps some day I’ll do another post with 20-minute drawings over the years.

  • http://www.facebook.com Karl Geiger

    Pablo Casals played scales for hours daily his entire life.

  • http://www.facebook.com Peter Koziski

    In martial arts, or more specifically Chinese kung-fu, it is said that "The true Master is always a student". Meaning simply, never stop trying, striving to better oneself through continued diligence; always aware of the potential to learn something new. In fact, one of the most basic definitions of the words kung-fu is "success through determination and hard work". I believe this ethos mirrors your intent to convey such within the words and expressions of this note.I very much enjoyed it. Thank you, Fred.

  • http://www.facebook.com Karl Geiger

    Yes. Perfection implies a teleology for an ideal. Since humans are unique, each with his/her own "ideal", each changing as she/he lives, the notion is slippery at best. Better to say, "this is my best for today" and as evidenced here, we see some very good days.Epsilon is an infinitely elastic notion.

  • http://www.facebook.com Peter Koziski

    Karl, this is what I discovered from a few minutes of research regarding the character "Epsilon" you employed. I was intrigued by the use of such, and as it seems I am unaware of your ultimate meaning or definition, I was wondering if you could shed a little more light on the subject for me. "In mathematics (particularly calculus), an arbitrarily small positive quantity is commonly denoted ?; see (?, ?)-definition of limit. By analogy with this, the late mathematician Paul Erd?s also used the term "epsilons" to refer to children (Hoffman 1998, p. 4).In mathematics, the Levi-Civita symbol.In mathematics, to represent the dual numbers: a + b?, with ?2=0 and ??0.In mathematics, sometimes used to denote the Heaviside step function.[citation needed]In set theory, the limit ordinal of the sequence .In computing, the precision of a numeric data type and floating-point machine epsilon.In computer science, the empty string, though different writers use a variety of other symbols for the empty string as well, including the lower case Greek letter lambda.In physics, the permittivity of a medium.In physics and electronics, the emf of a circuitIn physics, the strain of a material (a ratio of extensions).In automata theory, a transition that involves no shifting of an input symbol.In astronomy, the fifth-brightest star in a constellation (see Bayer designation).In linguistics and the International Phonetic Alphabet, the Latin epsilon ? represents open-mid front unrounded vowel, as in the English word "pet" (/p?t/).In astronomy, Epsilon is the name for Uranus' most distant and most visible ring.In chemistry, the molar extinction coefficient of a chromophore.In economics, ? refers to elasticity.In statistics, to refer to error terms.In agriculture, to represent the "photosynthetic efficiency" of a particular plant or crop."

  • http://www.facebook.com Karl Geiger

    The mathematical notion is germane. There are two degrees of freedom to my meaning.Epsilon approaches today's "perfection" as finely as desired. In a universe now estimated at 1 hellameter in diameter, the distance of a kiss may be epsilon. Or the diameter of an electron.Tomorrow we may have a different epsilon in mind – the color of green in a new leaf or the peal of a temple bell.

  • http://www.facebook.com Peter Koziski

    Most excellent, sir. Thank you. I take it to mean that "possibility", in fact the very basic nature of the word, is ever-changing. We must be aware of this in order to realize the potential of the mind, objectively and subjectively. Infinity is a true state of being but can never be simply defined. Extremely interesting quandary this poses. Dichotomy, chiaroscuro, yin/yang, hard/ soft, sane/insane. So much to think about. Again, thank you. Very much appreciated.

  • http://www.facebook.com Karl Geiger

    The criteria bespeak the judge more than the judged.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/22796639@N05/ Jim in Alaska

    Quite interesting and thoughtful, Fred.

    I suspect one could define talent as the 5 “Ps”; Purpose, Passion and Practice! Practice! Practice!

    • http://www.fredhatt.com/blog/ fred

      Yes, Jim, and maybe “proclivity”. I’ve never been able to sustain that kind of effort at anything else without getting bored or discouraged. Even with drawing, there’s no way I’d have been able to do thousands of still-life drawings steadily for years and years. I had to find the specific type of practice that clicked for me, that riveted my attention.

  • http://www.facebook.com Fred Hatt

    Thanks for the comments, Karl and Peter. They say practice makes perfect, but I think practice makes you realize there's no such thing as perfect.

  • Harold Hatt

    Re: Practice
    In a post-game interview, a high scoring hockey player said that he was lucky. Then he added, and I notice that the more I practice, the luckier I get.

  • http://www.fredhatt.com/blog/ fred

    Thanks for the comment, Dad. More practice may improve luck in hockey, but unfortunately some people assume what’s true for hockey must be true for gambling!

  • http://www.Vishinsky.com Sergei Vishinsky

    Fred you are a genius! I had to read this post after seeing your comment on museworthy’s blog about the art students not wanting to be challenged. Practicing and challenging yourself is a gift and only allows you to become better at art.

    • http://www.fredhatt.com/blog/ fred

      Thanks, Sergei. The real artists don’t even need to be told this. As soon as they feel themselves working a rut the boredom of it starts driving them nuts and they do something to bust out of it.

  • Jennifer

    A most thoughtful and insightful blog entry.

    To quote Sparks (who were quoting someone else?): ‘How do I get to Carnegie Hall?

    Practice, man, practice!’

    I never quite understand the many people I’ve met who don’t want to carry on with their life drawing after a couple of terms. Even if the course is the same the next year, one’s response will be different to each challenge. But then equally I completely fail in terms of doing half an hour’s drawing a day in a sketchbook!

    It was great to see your practice in action at Spring Studios – already a week ago and you will no doubt now have have done more …

    • http://www.fredhatt.com/blog/ fred

      Jennifer, it was great having you with us at Spring Studio, and I’m glad you made it back home before the wrath of Eyjafjallajökull! Even just in the one session I could tell you were approaching the practice with a good attitude – open-minded, playful and really working at it.

Better Tag Cloud