DRAWING LIFE by fred hatt

2009/04/20

Art & Fear

Filed under: Reviews: Writing — Tags: , , , — fred @ 20:23

Among artists over the years, I’ve often heard mention of a little book called Art & Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking, by David Bayles & Ted Orland (1993, Image Continuum Press).  The title never appealed to me, but the book kept rising to the surface, one of those things artists recommend or pass along to each other, so when it came up again I decided to read it.  It’s only 122 pages long.

The book emerged from years of conversation between Bayles and Orland around the question of why so many artists give up and quit.  The authors are both photographers, but they’ve deliberately chosen to focus on principles applicable to workers in just about any artform, and they are careful to draw their illustrative examples from a wide range of creative fields.

Personally, I’ve been making art for so long that I can’t even imagine giving it up, though, over time, I have experienced all the frustrations and doubts they describe.  As they say, “Making art now means working in the face of uncertainty; it means living with doubt and contradiction, doing something no one much cares whether you do, and for which there may be neither audience nor reward.”  Wow, that sums up the artist’s biggest challenge really well!

I’ve persevered as an artist just because I couldn’t find anything else that satisfied my soul deep down, but if I had had a family making urgent demands of me I can imagine succumbing to the difficulties.  Bayles and Orland have clearly observed and understood what artists go through, and they’ve distilled it into a gem of wisdom in this book.

Art & Fear had me constantly thinking, “Yes, I recognize exactly what you’re talking about.  I’ve seen it again and again.”  I was surprised to see these things expressed so succinctly, and then surprised again to realize that the issues are so common and yet so little addressed in writing on art.

The authors see right through the theoretical and romantic pretensions that cluster so thickly around art, and they go directly to the heart of the matter, from the point of view of the working artist.  And you have to admire the brevity!   Any artist tormented by blocks or doubts should give Art & Fear the small time it takes to make its big points.

2009/04/14

Composing on the Fly

Gaze Angle, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle, 2009, by Fred Hatt

This is one of my big black drawings, made about three weeks ago.  It’s 48″ x 60″, or 122 cm x 152 cm, aquarelle crayon on black paper cut from a large roll.  Excepting a little finishing work, this drawing was completed in one three hour session working from life with model Jessi.  I made some small warm-up drawings in a sketchbook at the beginning of our session, but didn’t directly use any of those in putting together the big piece.  There was no pre-planned composition.  I worked on the floor, sometimes crawling on top of the drawing, looking at my model on the other side of the studio.  All the overlapping figures are different poses of the same model.

I’ve made a number of these big drawings.  Sometimes they really work, and sometimes they fail, but when they do work the compositions have a vigor and a naturalness that I’ve never been able to achieve by deliberate design.

For this session, I photographed the work in progress whenever we took a break.  The “in progress” photos are a little rough.  You’ll see the weighted balls I use to hold the paper down, and in the first one the edge of my crayon box.  But they give some idea of how the work proceeds.

Stage 1, overlapping poses:

Gaze Angle, stage 1, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle, stage 1, 2009, by Fred Hatt

I started out by just asking Jessi to take different short poses of her own choosing for a few minutes at a time.  I sketched them with different colors, chosen arbitrarily, so when they overlap it would be possible to distinguish the lines of one figure from another.  By the time we took our first break there were five figures, already occupying most of the page.  I believe the figures were sketched working around the page in a clockwise direction, starting with the one on the lower right.   At this point I needed to stand up and get a sense of what was beginning to develop, and what possibilities remained in the still open spaces.  Jessi and I both looked at the piece and talked about what might come next.  These works are truly collaborations with the model!

Stage 2, establishing a center:

Gaze Angle, stage 2, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle, stage 2, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Only two additional figures were added in the second session, a sideways reclining pose in the upper half, and a kneeling figure with face upturned in the center.  That pose was selected specifically to fit the open space we noticed at the time of our first break.  I had also felt there was something interesting about the different heads facing in different directions.  A face looking upwards and another turned away seemed to add balance to this aspect of the composition.  I also liked the overlapping of hands and feet at the right center of the piece, and the juxtaposition of the four heads on the far left side with the roundness of shoulders, breast and thigh.

Stage 3, filling gaps:

Gaze Angle, stage 3, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle, stage 3, 2009, by Fred Hatt

During the third session, a foreshortened reclining figure was added to the largest remaining sparsely drawn area of the page.  Then two of the faces flanking that figure were developed.  They may have been looking a little lost in the increasing density and needed to be pulled forward.  The face just to the right of the center was given bright white eyes looking directly at the viewer of the drawing.  I think of that as a hook, a place to stop the eyes when they are swirling around in all the turbulence of the picture.  Some very linear body fragments were used to fill the two remaining “holes”.

Stage 4,  end of time working with model:

Gaze Angle, stage 4, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle, stage 4, 2009, by Fred Hatt

At this point we were running out of time.  At our last break I had noticed two areas that still felt a little undefined.  I’d seen Jessi with her face cradled in her hands, and this image seemed to add a nice bit of crisp detail, seen from two angles and left in a pure linear state, without shading.

Stage 5, finishing touches, days later:

Gaze Angle, 2009, by Fred Hatt

Gaze Angle (final), 2009, by Fred Hatt

After my session with Jessi was over I pinned the drawing up on the wall where I could walk past it and look at it over the next several days.  Finally, I made some finishing touches on it.  Not too much – It’s very easy to screw up a drawing like this by overworking it.  Just some background colors to bring out some parts of the figures that tend to get lost, and to separate and sharpen some of the facets.  There are also a few touches like the blue highlighting on the upper left and upper right faces, cross contours to give dimension to the elbow and hand in the upper left corner, and some development in the necks and collarbones near the center.

If you’re interested in other drawings made with this process, check out this gallery on my portfolio site.  I don’t know if anyone else works in a similar way – if you know of someone, let me know by leaving a comment.

This style developed out of my interest in capturing movement in drawing, and in working with the tension between order and chaos.  I noticed that my quick sketches had a great feeling of energy, but that energy was often diminished as a drawing became more finished.  I wanted to keep the spontaneity while increasing the complexity.  When hiring models for private work, I was compelled to do everything it was impossible to do in the regular group drawing sessions I attend. I can afford to hire models only occasionally, so I want to get my money’s worth!

For me, this process is about the magic of collaborating with Chaos.  I avoid preconceiving either the design or the theme.  As I wrote in one of my artist’s statements, “What is expressed in these works is not a concept or a personal feeling, but something unconceived, a spirit that emerges from the moment, from the interaction of artist and model and environment.”

I think I learned a lot from my brother Frank, a musician with a love for improvisation.  The key to improvising is to be fully engaged in the moment.  These drawings are one of my ways of practicing that vital spiritual discipline.

2009/04/09

Dorsal Emblems

Filed under: Body Art — Tags: , , — fred @ 20:30
Bird Goddess, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Bird Goddess, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Most of the body art shown in my online portfolios here and here is full-body work done in my studio.  But I have also frequently done body painting at festivals such as Sirius Rising, Starwood, Dance New England Summer Camp and the American Body Arts Festival, at pageants such as Earth Celebrations‘ Rites of Spring, and for dance performances, gallery openings and parties.   At such events, people often want images that express their personality or symbols that have spiritual meaning for them.  It’s just like a tattoo, but more spontaneous, less painful, and far less permanent.

The back is a good surface for painting, because it is relatively flat and expansive, but also because in touching someone’s back I feel directly connected to their essential energy without being distracted by their face.  So here’s a collection of images painted on people’s backs.

Botanical imagery expresses vitality and the power of growth:

Flower of Life, 2007, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Flower of Life, 2007, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Green Man, 2004, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Green Man, 2004, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Yggdrasil, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Yggdrasil, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

This one is a Tree of Life, one of those archetypal images that appears in many forms in widespread cultures.  One of its meanings is making a connection between Heaven and Earth, as the tree penetrates and draws from the powers of both realms.  The trunk of the tree adorning the human trunk asserts that human life is poised between and nourished by the same poles.  The painting above was made to conceal a surgical scar with a healing symbol.

Another image of uniting the material and the spiritual worlds is the Winged Serpent.  The serpent slithering up the spine is also an expression of Kundalini, or the vertical flow of life energy in the body, while the wings express expansion and inspiration.  The wings on this one look a bit like a view of the lungs inside the thorax.

Winged Serpent, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Winged Serpent, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Quetzalcoatl, 2001, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Quetzalcoatl, 2001, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

The version directly above was made for a performance by the great dancer and choreographer Homer Avila, who had recently lost a leg to cancer.

The butterfly expresses the idea of transformation and rebirth.  I find it nearly impossible to capture the beauty of a real butterfly in paint.  I reach for the feeling of expansiveness:

Papillon, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Papillon, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Birds express freedom and transcendence, power and intensity.  Here are three strong birds:

Firebird, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Firebird, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Eagle, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Eagle, 2002, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Falcon, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Falcon, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

What I love most is when someone gives me free rein to paint whatever naturally emerges from the contact of my imagination and their body, through the divining-rod of the brush.  Here’s a proud striding bird:

Walking Bird, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Walking Bird, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Arcs, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Arcs, 2005, bodypaint and photo by Fred Hatt

Here is a pure abstraction, not a symbolic image at all, but I think it expresses something about the complexity and beauty of the person it adorns, something a symbol, with all its cultural baggage, never could.

2009/04/07

Noémie Lafrance: Home

Filed under: Reviews: Other Events — Tags: , , , — fred @ 16:13

Today I saw the new experimental performance created by Brooklyn-based artist Noémie Lafrance, Home: The Body as Place. Lafrance is determined to give her audience new and fresh experiences, and has pursued this goal by creating dance for unusual sites, including in the ruins of a vast Robert Moses-era public pool in Brooklyn and on the soaring metallic curves of a Frank Gehry building at Bard College.  Home takes the body itself as the site, making the experience far more intimate than those other pieces.  But the long table around which the audience is seated and upon which most of the action takes place is itself absolutely protean, becoming at different times in this strange ritual a boardroom table, a banquet table, a dancer’s runway, and a funerary slab.  Our hosts are antlered earth-mothers, Maré Hieronimus and the very pregnant Lafrance.

Lafrance is fearlessly experimental, and even if some of her vignettes may feel awkward or silly, it only makes us feel that these experiences are being offered to us in a spirit of generosity.  Home is a participatory ritual.  In breaking the barriers separating audience from performers, Lafrance aims to break down the barriers estranging us from the Earth that birthed and sustains us.  I’ll refrain from describing the images and events as the piece will be best enjoyed if you have no idea what is coming next.  Details and tickets here.

2009/04/03

Shapes of Things

Filed under: Photography: Stereoscopic — Tags: , , , — fred @ 16:56

Pieta, 1995, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Stereo photography has existed almost since the birth of photography.  It works on the principle that the brain perceives depth by interpreting the slight difference in views between the two eyes.  So two photographs taken from a few inches apart, with the appropriate view seen separately by each eye, shows shape and depth.  As a kid I loved ViewMaster reels and old-fashioned Stereoscope cards.  Starting around 1990 I began taking my own stereo photographs.  Using a standard 35mm camera, I would take two shots with a small lateral shift in point of view.  As long as the subject keeps still, it is not necessary to use a camera that takes two shots simultaneously.

The original photographs have hypnotic color and depth when viewed in a special viewer.  Online, the easiest way to present them is as “anaglyphs”, for viewing with a red filter over the left eye and a cyan, blue or green filter over the right eye.  The beautiful colors of the original images don’t survive the anaglyph conversion well, so I’ve chosen images that work well in black and white, and taken the color out.

I think I have a sculptor’s eye for form and space, but I’m more interested in preserving images or experiences than in collecting or making objects.  Stereo photographs render complex forms quite beautifully.  The fungus shown here is bright yellow in the color version of this photo:

Fungus, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Fungus, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

It’s also interesting to look at structure, whether a somewhat haphazard stack of bricks, a complex steel lattice, a neoclassical dome, or medieval stonework.  The second you may recognize as being from New York’s Jacob Javits Center, the third as the Washington State House in Olympia, and the fourth as the Cloisters Museum in Upper Manhattan.

Bricks, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Bricks, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Framework, 1993, photo by Fred Hatt

State House Dome, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

State House Dome, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Columns, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Columns, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Trees are amazingly complicated forms in space, and they come in an endless variety.

Flame tree, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Flame Tree, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Plush Trees, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Plush Trees, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Roots, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Roots, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

All the shots in this posting are from photos I made in 1993, on 35mm color print film using a Canon AE-1 SLR, for a project to create stereo photos for use by optometrists for eye training exercises.  Looking at a stereo photograph, your eyes converge or diverge as your attention moves between foreground and background objects, so spending a lot of time looking at 3D images may be good for your eyesight.

When I mentioned to my brother, Frank, that I was preparing a post of stereo photos, he recalled that when I used to present 3D slide shows, he had the experience afterwards of a heightened awareness of depth perception in the real world.

Also interesting in stereo pictures are scenes that have pronounced perspective, seeing distant things through windows or between closer objects.

Hilltop, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Hilltop, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Rainy Window, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Rainy Window, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Parked Cars, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

Parked Cars, 1993, stereo photo by Fred Hatt

The compositional dynamics of a flat photograph are simple, their impact immediate and graphic.  A stereo image is more complex.  Looking at it, we feel we are looking through a window, perhaps into a world that has been miniaturized and frozen in time.  The eyes caress the forms or penetrate the space of the image.  Enjoy these images, then go out and revel in the spatial complexity of the world.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Theme Tweaker by Unreal